If You Understand Nothing Else, Ever — Understand This:

judge2banna (1)  Anna von Reitz

Unincorporated = Sovereign. 
Unincorporated = Sovereign. 
Unincorporated = Sovereign.

Here are the niceties: a man is not a name.  A name is a “person”.

A man is naturally unincorporated and sovereign in nature. He does not depend on recognition or written charters or agreements for his existence. He doesn’t even have a name when he starts out, and when he acquires a name after being born, that name is “corporate” but not “incorporated”.

A Given Name is a Trade Name operating within the international land jurisdiction. “John Mark Doe” is a person that belongs to one of the people. It is a possession or gift given to us by our parents, just like a bicycle or a hope chest. Such a name is “corporate” but not “incorporated”.

For example, we often see business names like “Fletcher and Sons” and “Bo-Peep’s Sheep Yarns” that are not incorporated entities. These small businesses are corporate, fictional entities, but they are not chartered by any government or parent corporation, receive no special privileges, are not franchises and owe nobody but their owners for their existence.

In the same way, “John Mark Doe” is a fictional entity apart from the man who uses it —the name is not the man— so it is corporate, but since “he” is not chartered by any government or parent corporation, receives no special privileges, isn’t a franchise, and owes nobody but God and his parents for his existence, he is not incorporated. The Trade Name, like the living man, is unincorporated and sovereign.

This same rule applies to all business and trade organizations that are corporate, but not incorporated.

Thus, Santa Clara County, Unincorporated, is a sovereign entity. It’s corporate in that it is fictional, but it isn’t incorporated; it does not owe its existence to some other entity and is not receiving its right to exist or any special privileges from any other entity. It operates on the land and soil of California, Unincorporated, which is also a sovereign entity.

Sovereign states and counties can’t go bankrupt, have no “corporate veil” to protect stockholders, and don’t receive any special benefits or privileges (like the ability to go bankrupt) from any sponsoring organization or parent corporation.

The County of Santa Clara and the State of California are totally different, non-sovereign incorporated franchises of Territorial United States corporations. They are like Dairy Queen or Burger King franchises. They all operate under constitutions that comply with The Constitution of the United States of America. They all receive privileges from and operating capital from parent corporations that sponsor them and which are responsible for their existence and for granting them privileges.

So, when a state like California incorporates and forms a State of California territorial franchise or a STATE OF CALIFORNIA municipal franchise, it loses its sovereignty and devolves to being equivalent to any other such incorporated entity. It is no different than P.J. Mudd’s BBQ, Inc. or J.C. PENNY, INC.

This is underlined and confirmed by The Clearfield Doctrine.

California (Unincorporated) functions in the capacity of a sovereign state. Santa Clara County (Unincorporated) functions in the capacity of a sovereign county. State of California is just a local incorporated franchise of the territorial USA, Inc. STATE OF CALIFORNIA is a local incorporated franchise of the municipal UNITED STATES, INC. County of Santa Clara is just a franchise of a franchise: the State of California. These all function in the capacity of incorporated franchises that owe their existence to and receive privileges from foreign governments and foreign parent corporations.

Think in terms of the French-chartered Target, Inc. stores that dot the landscape. These are all foreign corporations. They are all incorporated franchises of the parent corporation –Target International, Inc.

So, ask yourselves— how could you be subject to the rules imposed by a Target store? — because in essence, that is the nature of the “State of California” and the “STATE OF CALIFORNIA”, too. They are local incorporated franchises of foreign parent corporations. Just like Target.

If you are employed by Target, you obviously have to follow its corporate policies, wear its uniforms, etc. If you volunteer to enter a Target store, you have to follow their rules inside their store, too, or their private security guards will keep you from running up and down the escalators.

It’s no different, folks— except that these foreign commercial corporation franchises have bamboozled you into thinking that they are or that they represent the actual California state, when all they really are is an incorporated business providing government services.

Ask yourselves what happens when you organize your unincorporated counties and your unincorporated states—- which are all sovereign entities? Ah, so, then we get back to the actual states and the actual people and the Law of the Land. This is the missing link. This is where the power lies— in being unincorporated.

Unincorporated = sovereign.

_________________________________________________________

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.