More Nitty-Gritty: How the Bar Associations Contrived to Overcome the Constitution and Common Law

   Judge Anna von Reitz

We have long been aware of the “sea change” that happened in the American Court System circa 1965-66. We have been aware that the result was an unlawful conversion of the State of State Courts from operating in Common Law to Statutory Law and that this was accompanied by an equally unconstitutional and improper shift in legal presumptions about our “Persons”—in fact, an unlawful conversion and trafficking in our Persons occurred.

The organic constitutions under which our states (soil) and States (land) function all refer to “persons” defined as Natural Persons — living men and women — and “inhabitants” — again, living people who have made their home (soil) and established their domicile (land) in one of the sovereign States of The United States of America.

So exactly how was this sleight of hand “redefining” Natural Persons as legal fiction “Persons” accomplished, and how was the Organic Constitution and Common Law overthrown? And why?

The why is simple enough. The Territorial and Municipal United States and their federated “State of States” business franchises had been operating on a fiat currency system for decades and draining away our American silver dollars via their inequitable “dollar for dollar” exchange rate established by the 1934 Emergency Banking Act. By 1965 they were looking for new actual, factual assets to “exchange” for their I.O.U.s.

Credit systems based on I.O.U’s. are not real in the sense of having something of intrinsic hold-in-your-hand value to exchange. Having established a virtual monopoly on our monetary system and having removed both gold and (largely though not entirely) silver from circulation at that time, they moved on to the next obvious step — creating the fictional Persons/PERSONS to go with their fictional money — and seizing upon and subjecting our actual Natural Persons as the source of their credit.

So profit and control of our assets were the motives. That’s why.

And here’s how: an unconstitutional and undisclosed “amendment” to the State Constitutions, allowing the rats to tack on statutory law as an administrative option and allowing the commingling of “Persons”—-which then allows them to use “judicial discretion” to unlawfully convert Natural Persons to legal fiction Persons and prosecute these under statutory law.

These “amendments” were presented as voter initiatives by the schemers who then purposefully misled voters as to the nature and affect of the proposed amendments to their State Constitutions.

We have it dead in the water in New Hampshire and it is being confirmed as a repeat performance at about the same time in all fifty States. This is proof of a nationwide conspiracy, promoted by local Bar Association members and allowed by politicians.

All these “amendments” are null and void for fraud and failure to disclose their intent and affect, and in violation of the original organic Constitutions owed to the States and People.

The paperwork related to New Hampshire’s case is being posted on my website: www.annavonreitz.com.

We need researchers in all fifty (50) states to examine the voter initiatives and constitutional amendments proposed in your states in about the same time period — 1965-66 — to nail down the same fraud being promoted in all fifty states.

These amendments allowing commingling of “Persons” need to be nullified by declaration from the moment of their adoption and brought forward for nullification by the courts themselves.

ANNAVONREITZ.COM

_________________________________________________________

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.