Judge Anna von Reitz
A couple weeks ago, I published an Article called “This is the Big One”—- in which I observed that: (1) in commerce, the truth is established by Affidavit, and (2) that corporations cannot possibly give an Affidavit because they have no “voice” or motive force enabling them to do such a thing, and (3) since you have been “defined” to be operating in the capacity of a corporation (JOHN DOE, JOHN M.DOE, JOHN MARK DOE) you have therefore been deprived of having any voice or ability to make an Affidavit. Thus, YOU are helpless and cannot defend yourself or present the Truth in a commercial court.
So some people missed the point entirely, and others could not reason their way forward to a solution for this conundrum.
You will note that the exact verbiage of the Maxim is– “Truth in commerce is established in the form of an Affidavit”.
Thus, when you wish to act in the capacity of a Living Man in a commercial court, you do not offer an Affidavit — because in the current scenario that allows them to ignore every word you say or write.
Instead, you offer “Living Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit”.
You follow the “form” of an affidavit which is to swear or affirm for the Public and Private Record and from without the United States that your testimony is true, correct, and not misleading— and then you enumerate your facts: 1, 2, 3, 4….
This allows the Court to hear your facts and gives de facto rebuttal to the presumption that you are acting in the capacity of a corporate franchise.
And since your opponent is a corporation, it has no ability to answer your Living Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit with any countering Affidavit— and your facts stand as Truth in Commerce by default.
If the opposing attorney attempts to say anything or make any further argument in the case, ask how a corporation pretends to issue any opposition to your Living Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit?
They are caught in their own net.
A corporation can’t make an affidavit and as officers of the court, they are all operating as corporations, including the JUDGE and the Prosecutor and the PLAINTIFF.
Plus, the Prosecutor/Prosecuting Attorney has no first-hand knowledge so cannot serve as a Witness or make any statement in evidence.