Judge Anna von Reitz
I am highly irritated by people who don’t read what I actually write, and then comment on it unfavorably based on what I didn’t in fact say.
Here’s an example.
I have had people commenting that, of course, the British United States has a life of its own. After all, isn’t Puerto Rico a (bankrupt) British Commonwealth?
Yes, indeed it is. The more is the pity for the Puerto Ricans.
What I said was this:
“The Federal Government does not have any life of its own. It functions on Delegated Powers with respect to us, and it has recently lost those Delegated Powers as a result of its own mismanagement.”
Note the small but important phrase, “with respect to us”.
The British Territorial United States must be viewed in context, and I very clearly stated my context—- “with respect to us” — meaning the actual States and People of the Federal Union that they, the “citizens” of the British Territorial United States are supposed to be providing Good Faith “essential government services” to. And are not.
Likewise, nothing I said about the gold in the Philippines implied that “all” the gold cashiered in the Philippines belongs to us. But we do know how much was shipped there and what does belong to us and we want it back, payable to The United States of America, our member States and People.
We also take objection to the Talon(g)s claim to own the Philippines; having once sold the Philippine Islands to us in 1898, and never having purchased it back with blood or money, we find their claims unfounded and offensive.
There was plenty of American blood spilled on top of everything else to secure and reclaim the Philippines in World War II, and we have never been repaid for that, either.
Their presumption in claiming our estates in 1953 for the British and Spanish Monarchies, after failing their Fiduciary duties to notify us and acting in pure, gross Breach of Trust, is odious in the extreme.
They and other parties have been making use of our assets in our “absence” and have not by any means functioned as faithful stewards, whereupon we note that the probate of our estates never closes and now that we are “home” again, must be provided back to us, free and clear of debt and encumbrance, together with all leases, fees, tithes, insurances, and other payments due the lawful landlords.
We are not acting in any oppressive or unfair way.
We are simply demanding our due, the return of our assets, and no further monkey business.
Everyone read that twice to be sure what I actually said.