Double take

Response to Anna’s last two postings on 1-12-20  by Robert-dean:House
.
First article:
For the sake of peace, about midway down, “It’s not for me or anyone else to judge them.”  “The rest of us wake up and stop electing Reptilians.”  That’s a mouth full.  You are assuming that the elections are in fact conducted by the people and are not manipulated when the copyright computer creator, or someone else, has not interfered.  So now you are directing the people to stop voting-in the wrong people.  How do you know they are elected by the people and not simply selected by the Board of Directors and their minions.  Or, that they are they may be the right people for the office but once they enter that office the are approached and threatened to act in the Corporations desired ways?   The only true election must be conducted by paper ballot no matter how inconvenient it might be.  Ours is to teach the people, not to put blame.
.
Second article:
Advisement about Common Law Writs.  “On April the 7th of this year.”  This one just blows me away.  I thought that Anna declared her Status?  What the paragraph tells me, an x-deputy sheriff, that the vehicle tag that was on her vehicle belongs to the Corporate State of Alaska thus making the owner of the vehicle, (not automobile), the State of Alaska and Anna the renter.  And I will admit I have to assume something here, but I can’t.  There is information missing.  The question here is did Anna have a Drivers License to display to the officer since he is the enforcer for the Corporate State of Alaska and she was in operation of their vehicle?  If not, Did he conduct a fiscal arrest right there at the time of the stop?  I do not know about Alaska but in Florida and a lot of other States it is not an arrestable offense to not produce a D.L. or Registration but can be a ticket, (Contract), with a fine to be paid within 30 days or you may choose a court appearance where the judge will attempt to fine you additionally for the courts time and the officers fees.  You see, the tag has a number on it that when placed into the officer’s computer informs the officer who the renter is and if the registration is currently under the renter’s name and if the renter has a D.L.
.
Therefore, I am left to assume that Anna agreed to contract with the ticket and took the invite to see the judge on the court date set.  If I am in error,  I invite the correct scenario.
.
Back in May of this year, I sent the Secretary of the STATE OF FLORIDA and the Attorney General of the STATE OF FLORIDA an affidavit of the scam they deceive the people with to get the people’s consent to turn ownership of their purchased automobile to the STATE via Certificate of registration.  To make a long true story short, I am still using my auto. with an expired tag as of Sept. 17th, even though I made my own tags under copyright/ patent number RDH1-1848.  I have not yet received a letter from them stating that the registration is expired or acknowledgment of the Affidavits for I informed then that any further use of the mail in this fraud would compound their situation as a Corporation doing business under D-U-N-S number _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, Which I included in the affidavit. I sent them my declaration of Status in 2016.
.
The tag was placed into their computer five times since 2016, two times I handed them a D.L. which they brought back, apologized and sent me on my way.  Two other times they just sat behind me for about 3 – 4 minutes then just simply drove away without contact.  And the fifth time was the afternoon of the very day the tags expired.  The officer was at a red light in the center lane of three lanes and a car next to him in front of me to his right. I have my windows down and I am not using a seat belt.  I yelled to him that his emergency lights were on, he was a K-9 unit and had his windows down.  The red light changed, he turned off his lights and we drove on.  He slowed and got next to me and saw the seat belt violation then slowed more and got behind me.  About 3 – 4 minutes later he pulled back into the center lane and proceeded away from me then turned off to the left at the next light.
.
I have since been informed that due to the Status change the computer displayed in red print, “Do not Engage.”
.
I have no fear of being stopped for the state tag expiration still on the Auto. and does still come up with the proper owner and address along with, “Do not Engage.”
.
However, should I be stopped and given the invite, (contract ticket), I would gladly accept it so I can then prove to all of you once and for all that the proper way to beat the invite is not in front of the judge but before going to the judge via affidavit, this is why you have 30 days.  They know what I intend to do and they will not give me the satisfaction of proving it.  They won’t ticket me because of, “Do not Engage”.  I can not prove it otherwise.  It would be like trying to prove to someone that you love your spouse.
.
So back to Anna’s situation.  It appears to me to be not of good use but a deterrent to claiming one’s status for in her situation it did not work.  Also, what was the final outcome?  Did you pay?  Or what?
.

All comments welcome  trefarmerh@centurylink.net

If Posted.
_________________________________________________________
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.