Donna Brazile ready to accept Mueller report findings, calls on Trump to prevent future Russian inte


Posted in Uncategorized

No Collusion! No Obstruction!

Per Attorney General Bill Barr’s four-page Summary Letter.  The findings are a complete and total exoneration.


Posted in Uncategorized

The Truth About “Southern Poverty Law Center”

anna-2   by Anna von Reitz

The Truth About “Southern Poverty Law Center”

No doubt some of you remember the Hit Pieces issued by SPLC trying to mislabel me (yes, me of all people) a “sovereign citizen” — to which I replied that the man writing the article never interviewed me (he was lying outright) and that the Southern Poverty Law Center isn’t “Southern”, isn’t concerned about “Poverty”, and as far as I can determine isn’t a “Law Center” either.

But I digress. Recent exposure of the slimy organization reveals that it has a budget of half a billion dollars — more than a small country. That in itself should raise eyebrows. If the “mission” is to help solve the southern poverty problem, imagine what half a billion invested in jobs and scholarships and actual help for poor people in Alabama could do?

But there is more…. Turns out that the King Pins in SPLC lost $60 million in court for telling more lies and slandering and libeling other people besides me.

This was a sore point with the Board of Directors for some reason, given that they have made it their business to slander and misrepresent others for decades in an effort to whip up fears of Jim Crow and increase donations.

Here’s a quote lifted from the ZeroHedge report from a former SPLC staffer:

““Outside of work,” recalls Bob Moser of his days working for the organization [Southern Poverty Law Center], “we spent a lot of time drinking and dissing in Montgomery bars and restaurants about … the hyperbolic fund-raising appeals, and the fact that, though the center claimed to be effective in fighting extremism, ‘hate’ always continued to be on the rise, more dangerous than ever, with each year’s report on hate groups. ‘The S.P.L.C.—making hate pay,’ we’d say.”

Just sayin’. If promoting baseless fear propaganda is part of your stock-and-trade —- presenting innocent people and organizations as threats, racists, and “haters” so as to plump up your own coffers to half a billion dollars — you should expect to get sued and be prepared to take it in the teeth.

So the Board fired their long-time fearless leader and co-founder, Morris Dees, just as the organization faced up to allegations of internal sexual misconduct. Now his successors and lieutenants are fleeing the proverbial kitchen, too.

Read on:…/splc-implodes-president-and-leg…

Who knows? Maybe SPLC will finally get some new leadership and upgrade their behavior and ethical standards to something above snake belly? Quoting the Washington Examiner article cited by ZeroHedge:

“The only thing worse than a snarling partisan activist is a slimy conman who merely pretends to be one.” -Washington Examiner

Posted in Uncategorized

Who to Trust?

anna-2   by Anna von Reitz

Who to Trust?

I often get asked who among the various sources should be trusted as reliable — and the answer is that none of us get it 100% right a 100% of the time. Including me.

Nor are we all “perfect” in all venues and respects, because everyone that I mention has their specialties and tends to work in some particular jurisdiction of the law or arena of historical inquiry. Some are focused on private relief and others are more focused on general relief/restoration of a proper lawful government and still others are focused on some particular historical research period.

So when I make a recommendation like this it is with a built-in caveat emptor, in that you have to know or learn where the pieces of the puzzle fit and define what your own needs are.

In terms of people/sources who reliably make the Good Faith Effort besides my own team and who dig up good nuggets of Truth with the consistency of Truffle Pigs, I would include [in no particular order]:

Rod Class — PAGs and Administrative Law
Kelby Smith of HISAdvocates — Private Living
Jean Keating — Maritime and Admiralty Law
Mark Emery — Private Living
Kurt Kallenbach – Paramount Claims of Life, History, DNA
Romley Stewart – History, DOG LATIN, Fraud Investigation
Neo – Statutory Law and Practical Quick Fixes
Peter of England – Private Banking, Current Events
SEDM – Federal Bureaucracy, Private Living, Forms
Boris – Private Living
Jordan Maxwell – History, Birth Certificates
Robert David Steele – Natural Law
Field McConnell – Military, Administrative History
Neil Warren – Lawful Banking (England)
Richard Cornforth — Statutory Law, Legal History
John Trowbridge – History, Statutory Law, Constitution
Mary Croft – Government, History, Attitude Adjustment
Brent Winters – History of Law, Constitutions, Common Law
Freedom School – IRS, History, Statutory Law
Isaac Witham – Early American History, Treaties
Michael Kearns – Early American History, Treaties
SPLSPro — British Equity Law
Emily Windsor-Cragg – British History, British Law, Monarchy.
Republic of Texas – IRS and Tax Court, Land Patents

No doubt I am forgetting very worthy groups and people at this moment and will think of them with a big “ouch!” as they (or their fans) call me to task. Please don’t think that just because someone’s name doesn’t appear on The List that it is any strike against them per se. This is just an Off-the-Top-of-My-Head list of some of the many people and organizations who are contemporaries providing insights via websites, videos, teleconferences, or publications and who have consistently provided solid information in these subject areas.


Posted in Uncategorized

An Apology to Robert

anna-2   by Anna von Reitz

An Apology to Robert

Most of the time I am patient and explain things as well as I can and as often as necessary, but once in a while, I lose my temper — just get worn down and pop off at someone who hits me at the wrong moment with something that has been a cause of irritation for days or months or even years. This recently happened with Robert and I would like to apologize.

He wrote to me about the issue of “Affidavits of Truth”. He assumed that I was using Certificates to replace Affidavits and referenced an article of mine where I explained that living people who are acting in their unincorporated Lawful Person capacity can’t make Affidavits —– only corporations (like franchises) or officers of corporations can make Affidavits. The rest of us must label our presentations as “Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit”.

This is part of the Court Rules and part of the reason that our Testimony doesn’t get heard in Court. Another reason is that too many people file their paperwork with the Court Clerk and don’t file it with the Prosecutor directly and with the District Attorney.

They aren’t obliged to accept your Testimony, read it, react to it or respond to it until and unless you label it properly for what it is and present it to them. Directly.

There is a difference between an “Affidavit” and “Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit”, just as there is a difference between a “State of State” and an actual “State”.

I get worn out trying to teach people who don’t read things closely enough to notice these differences for themselves, and I can get really frustrated with those who still don’t notice these things AFTER I have pointed them out.

If a man asserts that he is operating exclusively as a Lawful Person and is owed exemption and exoneration, but then turns around and submits an “Affidavit” instead of a “Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit” he has presented conflicting information.

He is claiming to act in one capacity and then, by submitting an “Affidavit of Truth” instead of “Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit” is demonstrating that he is, in fact, operating in a completely different capacity. It’s like a Colonel in the Army showing up in full dress uniform and claiming that he’s a civilian.

If we are going to deal competently with the many issues facing this country, we must all learn to read things much more closely, with more attention to what the words actually say and how things are labeled and named.

So, I am sorry for losing my temper, Robert. It was just the straw that broke the camel’s back after months of trying to draw people’s attention to similar facts:

A State is not a State of State.
A State of State is not a STATE OF STATE.
An Affidavit is not Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit.
A United States Citizen is not a Citizen of the United States.
An American State National is not a US Citizen.
The United State [Unincorporated] is not the United States, Inc.
The United States of America [Unincorporated] is not the USA, Inc.
Indictments are not Presentments.
A Republican State is not a Republic, etc., etc., etc…

As confusing as the rats have made this, I actually have great sympathy with people who are threading their way through the maze and who care enough to do so. I’m sorry, Robert. Please forgive me for being Grandma Grump.


Posted in Uncategorized

The Mueller Nuthin

anna-2   by Anna von Reitz

The Mueller Nuthin

At last, the vaunted Mueller Investigation is over.

After a gozillion dollars spent on this politically motivated nonsense, we now know what most of us knew two (2) years ago: no collusion with Russia.

I am so disgusted by this whole waste of money and time and public discussion spent on this, that for once, words fail Grandma.

This should go down in our country’s history as something far worse than Watergate, and all of it focused on one man in an attempt to overturn an election.

If we never had any other example set before us as a valid reason to upchuck the whole private corporate election system and the continuance of any control of the purse-strings by political lobbyists, this one should suffice.


Posted in Uncategorized

What “Virgo Triad” Means:

anna-2by Anna von Reitz

What “Virgo Triad” Means:

The nom de guerre adopted by the Federale Disinfo Agent calling herself “Virgo Triad” literally means “Taxing Pitchfork”.

If you buy her crappola, that’s exactly where you will end up, too —- on the end of their “taxing pitchfork”!

A friend just dug that one out and it shows how these people choose their fake names with malice aforethought—- always thinking that they are too smart and “witty” for their insider jokes to be detected.

Well, from Karen and I —– hahahahahahah!


Posted in Uncategorized