Wooo-hooo! Fellow Campers!

judge2banna-1  Judge Anna von Reitz

For all those like me who have been calling John McCain a traitor to his face for years — this message goes out to every Republican nationwide, kindly reprinted from Judicial Watch:

——

John McCain & Staff Masterminded IRS Tea Party Targeting Scandal

McCain minority staff director Henry Kerner to IRS official Lois Lerner and other IRS officials: “the solution is to audit so many that it becomes financially ruinous”

Judicial Watch today released newly obtained internal IRS documents, including material revealing that Sen. John McCain’s former staff director and chief counsel on the Senate Homeland Security Permanent Subcommittee, Henry Kerner, urged top IRS officials, including then-director of exempt organizations Lois Lerner, to “audit so many that it becomes financially ruinous.”  Kerner was appointed by President Trump as Special Counsel for the United States Office of Special Counsel.

The explosive exchange was contained in notes taken by IRS employees at an April 30, 2013, meeting between Kerner, Lerner, and other high-ranking IRS officials. Just ten days following the meeting, former IRS director of exempt organizations Lois Lerner admitted that the IRS had a policy of improperly and deliberately delaying applications for tax-exempt status from conservative non-profit groups.

Lerner and other IRS officials met with select top staffers from the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee in a “marathon” meeting to discuss concerns raised by both Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) that the IRS was not reining in political advocacy groups in response to the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision.  Senator McCain had been the chief sponsor of the McCain-Feingold Act and called the Citizens United decision, which overturned portions of the Act, one of the “worst decisions I have ever seen.”

In the full notes of an April 30 meeting, McCain’s high-ranking staffer Kerner recommends harassing non-profit groups until they are unable to continue operating. Kerner tells Lerner, Steve Miller, then chief of staff to IRS commissioner, Nikole Flax, and other IRS officials, “Maybe the solution is to audit so many that it is financially ruinous.” In response, Lerner responded that “it is her job to oversee it all:”

Henry Kerner asked how to get to the abuse of organizations claiming section 501 (c)(4) but designed to be primarily political. Lois Lerner said the system works, but not in real time. Henry Kerner noted that these organizations don’t disclose donors. Lois Lerner said that if they don’t meet the requirements, we can come in and revoke, but it doesn’t happen timely. Nan Marks said if the concern is that organizations engaging in this activity don’t disclose donors, then the system doesn’t work. Henry Kerner said that maybe the solution is to audit so many that it is financially ruinous. Nikole noted that we have budget constraints. Elise Bean suggested using the list of organizations that made independent expenditures. Lois Lerner said that it is her job to oversee it all, not just political campaign activity.

Judicial Watch previously reported on the 2013 meeting.  Senator McCain then issued a statement decrying “false reports claiming that his office was somehow involved in IRS targeting of conservative groups.”   The IRS previously blacked out the notes of the meeting but Judicial Watch found the notes among subsequent documents released by the agency.

Judicial Watch separately uncovered that Lerner was under significant pressure from both Democrats in Congress and the Obama DOJ and FBI to prosecute and jail the groups the IRS was already improperly targeting. In discussing pressure from Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (Democrat-Rhode Island) to prosecute these “political groups,” Lerner admitted, “it is ALL about 501(c)(4) orgs and political activity.”

The April 30, 2013 meeting came just under two weeks prior to Lerner’s admission during an ABA meeting that the IRS had “inappropriately” targeted conservative groups.  In her May 2013 answer to a planted question, in which she admitted to the “absolutely incorrect, insensitive, and inappropriate” targeting of Tea Party and conservative groups, Lerner suggested the IRS targeting occurred due to an “uptick” in 501 (c)(4) applications to the IRS but in actuality, there had been a decrease in such applications in 2010.

On May 14, 2013, a report by Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration revealed: “Early in Calendar Year 2010, the IRS began using inappropriate criteria to identify organizations applying for tax-exempt status” (e.g., lists of past and future donors). The illegal IRS reviews continued “for more than 18 months” and “delayed processing of targeted groups’ applications” in advance of the 2012 presidential election.

All these documents were forced out of the IRS as a result of an October 2013 Judicial Watch Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the IRS after it failed to respond adequately to four FOIA requests sent in May 2013 (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service (No. 1:13-cv-01559)). Judicial Watch is seeking:

  • All records related to the number of applications received or related to communications between the IRS and members of the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate regarding the review process for organizations applying for tax exempt status under 501(c)(4);
  • All records concerning communications between the IRS and the Executive Branch or any other government agency regarding the review process for organizations applying for tax exempt status under 501(c)(4);
  • Copies of any questionnaires and all records related to the preparation of questionnaires sent to organizations applying for 501(c)(4) tax exempt status.
  • All records related to Lois Lerner’s communication with other IRS employees, as well as government or private entity outside the IRS regarding the review and approval process for 501 (c)(4) applicant organizations.

“The Obama IRS scandal is bipartisan – McCain and Democrats who wanted to regulate political speech lost at the Supreme Court, so they sought to use the IRS to harass innocent Americans,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama IRS scandal is not over – as Judicial Watch continues to uncover smoking gun documents that raise questions about how the Obama administration weaponized the IRS, the FEC, FBI, and DOJ to target the First Amendment rights of Americans.”

_________________________________________________________

 

Posted in Uncategorized

The Actual Status Report

   Judge Anna von Reitz

Let us all realize that, first of all, banks and money are founded on the iniquity of idolatry.  Money is a “symbol” of value the same way that a little stone or carved wood idol is a “symbol” of God.  The same process of idolatry is at the root of the entire idea and use of all forms of money.

Let us also all realize that in the modern world, money is a commodity, like beer or cheese.  There are a gozillion different kinds and brand names of money in exactly the same way as there are brands of beer or cheese, and they all present their own national characters and quirks.
.
Let us also realize that there is a profound difference between “money” which has a value in-and-of-itself, such as a gold coin that has some intrinsic value in trade, and “legal tender currencies” — like bonds and notes and letters of credit.  And there is additionally, a market in other “securities” — like stocks and commodity futures.
.
For the past week I have been deluged by circumstance and correspondence to explain what is going on in the banking world.  Well, which banking world?  The world of actual asset-backed money, or the world of legal tender currencies, or the stock market or…..?
.
If I were to explain in very general terms — there is a Gross Imbalance, at least so far as the bookkeeping is concerned — between actual assets and bonds, notes, and letters of credit.  And there is a terrible, inappropriate, and looking-to-be fatal infringement of investment banking on the rest of the banking world.
.
Up until the disaster of 2008 and what has been called “The Big Short” on Wall Street, banking — at least in this country — was separated according to function.
We have had traditional trade banks, limited commercial banks, international commercial banks, and investment banks.
.
It is this last category of banks that demands our attention: investment banks.
.
Investment banks have always been the shadiest, most irresponsible, most intrinsically dishonest operators on the block, and for decades prior to the 2008 Lehman Brothers et alia debacle, they were prevented by the Glass-Steagall Act from participating in general commerce and co-mingling their operations with banks meant to serve the public and do “straight” transactions among corporate clients.
.
By “straight” transactions, we imply the honest mundane Point A to Point B transactions we associate with normal banking, devoid of hidden agendas, double escrows, undisclosed usury fees, undisclosed investments made “for” bank customers and shareholders, and similar rotten business practices that no sane country would condone.
.
In the aftermath of the 2008 mess, Glass-Steagall was repealed and the investment banks were let loose like a pack of wild hyenas to feast upon the flesh of the unsuspecting world.  For many large commercial banks this simply meant the merger of their “investment bank” with their public commercial bank functions.
.
For some, like Wells Fargo, that had already been skating the edge of the law by abusive use of copyright non-disclosure (Wells Fargo hasn’t been an actual bank for years, but is instead a securities investment firm — an investment bank operating under the trademarked name of the old “Wells Fargo Bank”—otherwise known as a wolf in sheep’s clothing.) the repeal of Glass-Steagall meant coming out of the closet and no longer having to worry about enforcement of the actual law.
.
Investment banks presume upon their shareholders and especially their depositors to use their deposited assets as assets that can be invested by the bank. There is a (largely undisclosed) quid pro quo, that if you leave your jewels in a deposit box, they belong to the bank as assets that can be used to secure investments for the bank or lines of credit for the bank.  So by removing Glass-Steagall, one of the immediate impacts of merging normal commercial bank functions with investment bank functions was to open up all the depositor’s resources as investment assets.
.
Oh, you, the unwitting depositors, are now supposed to be investors in the bank, just like you are unwittingly being mis-characterized as corporate franchises of the British Crown Corporation — but never mind that your pants have been dropped and you’ve been bent over.
.
Merrily, the banks seized upon this incredible windfall of new investment assets and began investing —- mainly on PrivateTrading Platforms.
.
What, you may ask, is a “Private Trading Platform”?
.
These are to a Credit Scheme what unlimited crude oil is to Exxon.
.
Like most evils, Trading Platforms were initially designed for good reasons.  They were intended to give investors a safe way of using “unused assets” to generate cash for philanthropic projects while also yielding generous profits for the investors — a sop to the Uber Wealthy to make themselves richer with little or no risk, and make themselves out to be philanthropists at the same time.
.
You have an asset in a bank — say, a ton of physical gold cashiered away back in 1956 — and you agree to “block” this asset for a stated period of time, say, one year.  During that time, the asset will not be available to you to use or withdraw from the bank.  The Trading Platform organization will take possession of the transaction from there on, and will “trade upon” that asset for the next stipulated period of time — in this case, one year — in what amounts to a futures commodity market for assets.
.
Just like in any commodities futures market, the participants are betting on values and setting values for the assets in trade, making money off the transaction fees, and margins and the 7 to 10 fold expansion of credit that takes place when a bank — acting under the bogus “fractional reserve banking system” — issues the “new money” created out of thin air into the system.
.
What happened in real life is that a lot of parties who had assets just sitting in bank vaults all over the world jumped on the band wagon.  They were wealthy enough not to need those assets anyway, so why not “block” them and go on the trading platforms?
.
And the trading platform owners thought, well, why not cut ourselves in for 10, 20, 30…. whatever percent of the trade value?  Guarantee the investors a 100% of return on their blocked assets off the top of the “fractional reserve” — an amount of credit equal in value to the whole investment, plus a percentage of the rest of the fractional reserve created by this process?
.
.And after 2008 and the repeal of Glass-Steagall, the investment banks thought— what ho!  We can take all these “unused” depositor assets and go on the Trading Platforms and nobody will be the wiser.
.
This “system” is so insane, so profitable — on paper — that some investors including the CIA Retirement Fund, simply plunked down a gob of gold back when it all began and “let it ride” indefinitely, with the result that there are now Trading Platform Investment Accounts with 250 zeroes of “credit” standing on the books, and still no visible help to the poor and downtrodden, no relief for the “taxpayers” — just more and more and more credit for these madmen, and more purported debt imposed upon the labor of the people and assets of the world.
.
The reason that there is no substantial feedback into the world economy is that the Trading Platforms are too profitable at too little risk. And nobody is holding the investors— whether investment banks or individuals — accountable for actually doing philanthropic projects with the money.  They are being allowed to just roll the investments over and over and over.
.
In terms of investments there is no other show in town that can compare.  So all the giant public employee pension funds and giant State of State “un-budgeted accounts” have been engaged in this hoop-la along with all the investment banks that have surreptitiously seized upon their depositor’s assets—-and blocked and invested their assets “for” them without their knowledge or consent.
.
Now we come to the issue of the Historic Trusts…. as I have explained before, there are numerous kinds of Historic Trusts, mostly old family trusts, some old business trusts and banking trusts, some government treaty trusts — but what they have in common is that they hearken from a day when actual assets were used as money, and nearly all of the assets belonging to these Historic Trusts have been held as “Special Deposit Accounts” in banks that the banks have used to underwrite their operations.
.
Historic Trust assets underwrite virtually all central banks on Earth.
.
Some of you will recall that in 2011 the Chinese Government asked for the return of Chinese gold that the Nationalist Chinese Government left on deposit with the New York Federal Reserve Bank back in 1928.  Initially, the Chinese just wanted to be paid some of the interest they were owed on the deposit, but instead of paying on what was owed, the New York Fed stonewalled.
.
You may also remember a disturbing similar report wherein the German Government made a similar request for the return of gold held in trust and that they were told they could only receive it back in relatively small installments over a period of years.
.
What’s happened?  Why are all the actual trustees and owners of the Historic Trusts being similarly stonewalled when they ask for an accounting of their “Special Deposits”?
.
Because the repeal of Glass-Steagall allowed all the normal commercial banks to morph into investment banks and as investment banks, they seized upon their depositor’s assets and “blocked” them and put them under contract to these private Trading Platforms for periods of years unbeknownst to the victims of these immoral, undisclosed, and non-consensual practices.
.
It was never the intention of these out-of-control banks to share the proceeds of these surreptitious investments with the victims of these crimes, so what they have been trying to do is to circle the wagons and pretend that the records of these Historic Trusts have been lost, or make up excuses for why neither the assets nor the lines of credit that should be available from these assets are available to the Depositors. Well, the assets are “blocked” for varying periods of time, often years into the future, just like the Chinese and German gold deposits, and the profits from all this have already been contractually divided up between the offending banks and the operators of these “Private Trading Platforms”.
.
Meanwhile, Ted and Alice and Dick and Kelly are down in the trenches, suffering the hyper-inflation and bearing the purported (but odious) debt caused by this madness, and virtually none of the ‘philanthropic projects” that were the excuse for letting this system exist in the first place are getting done, because the lure of compiling more zeroes is just too attractive to the mentally unhinged bankers and traders among us.
.
Bottom line: the Glass-Steagall provisions need to be put in place again and the investment banks forced back into their boxes without any ceremony or great deliberation.  The “Private Trading Platforms” need to be shut down as illegal gambling arenas.  The assets need to be returned posthaste to the control and benefit of the actual owners.  The odious debts and non-existent credits need to be wiped off the books.  Those who already profited from this should be dinged for 100% of the profit, and that profit should be held in a Victim’s Fund for the benefit of the people of this world including the permanent end of all taxation, the restoration of the natural environment, and the building up of new beneficial technologies and infrastructure.
.
Since they couldn’t bring themselves to actually carry through on the charitable and philanthropic projects, we will do it “for” them.
.
In my opinion the members of the Municipal and Territorial United States “Congress” that allowed this whole situation need to run down a narrow track from DC to Boston being pelted with rotten vegetables the whole way, while their counterparts in London need to run a similar course all the way to Canterbury, where the faithful can seek absolution.
.
As for the “Roman Pontiffs” and the Conclaves of Cardinals that allowed this — and they are ultimately responsible for this entire mess — no Hot Potato Reaction seeking to wash their hands by closing the Pontifical Office can excuse both what they have done and what they have left undone.
.
The people and the Earth are owed far better leadership.
.

_________________________________________________________

Posted in Uncategorized

Please Note Again:

   Judge Anna von Reitz

I Do NOT “recommend” establishing TDA Accounts UNLESS you actually are a Federal United States Citizen (federal civil or military employee) or dependent (receiving free gratis welfare that you did not, in fact, pay for from the Federales).
.
TDA’s are not any kind of Magic Bullet. They have, apparently, been utilized in some cases (so far) to ameliorate debts owed by federal citizens. If you are not a federal citizen— employee or actual dependent — stay out of their system.
.
The difference is the difference between the relief you get in bankruptcy from debts you ran up irresponsibly, and the relief you get in probate when your property and assets are returned to you free and clear following a hearing to determine your status.
.
If you actually want to buy Federal bonds, such as Savings Bonds, Treasury Bonds, etc., and have logical need for such an account on a continuing basis, that is what those accounts were primarily designed for.
.

_________________________________________________________

Posted in Uncategorized

Domicile — The Governing Issue

judge2banna-1  Judge Anna von Reitz

We have been held — incorrectly — under “municipal law”.  And what is “municipal law”?  It is otherwise described as “private international law”.  Of course, we discovered this and other fun facts some time ago on the road — as Cat Stevens put it — “to find out”, but beyond the names and labels, what does that imply?

A state is governed by public international law — or is supposed to be; a commercial corporation, however, is governed under private international law.
.
I make a distinction here between commercial corporations which are chartered by states, and international trade organizations which are not chartered and truly privately held unincorporated entities.
.
Prior to this I have observed that “unincorporated” indicates “sovereign” entities and political status, and that it is entirely possible to be “corporate” without being “incorporated”.
.
So, in a nutshell, what the vermin have done is to grant us all a franchise — like a Dairy Queen franchise — to operate under our NAMES for their benefit.  This franchise is kept in a perpetual state of subjugation to their private municipal law by their presumption of guardianship over it, and periodically, these franchises are bankrupted for the convenience and profit of the parent organizations.
.
Our lawful Trade Names, also known as our “Good Names” and “Christian Names”  have thus been infringed upon and have been abused via legal chicanery and transported into the jurisdiction of municipal (private international law) by fraudulent actions undertaken by the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Administration and more recently by actions undertaken by the Obama Administration.
.
Whereas FDR mischaracterized us as Cestui Que Vie Estate Trusts, Obama has mischaracterized us as Public Transmitting Utilities.  And in both cases nothing is deserved but a firm and resounding, “No way in Hell.” from the American Public.
.
How to put an end to this pernicious deceit and fraud and victimization?  There are many issues to address, but by far, the most potent (and for them, unanswerable) issue is the issue of domicile.  Where do you choose to live?  And therefore, under what form of law do you live?
.
You do have a choice.  You have to have a choice guaranteed to you, for any of this to be legal in any sense of the word.
.
That is why the Expatriation Act was passed by the Rump Congress back in July of 1868 the day before they published their deceitfully disguised Articles of Incorporation as “The United States of America, Inc.” — a Scottish Commercial Corporation — as “The Constitution of the United States of America”.
.
The main pillar of their deceit has been the presumption that you “voluntarily” chose to live and function as a British Citizen, merely “residing” here for the purpose of providing “essential government services”.
.
If they and their presumptions were to be believed, nearly all of the American population voluntarily went to work for the Queen and the UK — sans a paycheck or any actual work assignments, of course.
.
All of this concerns only them and their deceits and their internal issues and workings and multiple bankruptcies.  We are, in fact and in truth, not part of their baileywick at all — they are in fact, part our our baileywick when they come ashore on American soil.
.
So how have they contrived to rob generations of Americans of the value of their material and intellectual and labor assets?
.
By making a false claim of domicile.  They signed you up as “citizens” of their version of “United States” when you were a baby in your cradle.  And they have used this falsified public record against you all the days of your lives to make your subject to both municipal and territorial law, instead of the Public Law of your actual state and country.
.
Thanks to their fraud, deceit, and Gross Breach of Trust, you now have to make a choice — will you be recognized as an American, free men and women owed all the rights, benefits, and property assets of your heritage, or will you continue to let these Euro-trash con artists continue to feed off of you and your country like leeches?
.
Obviously, you need to change the falsified public records by returning the Birth Certificates to their Sources and by making the declaration of domicile (or as they spelled it back then, “domicil”) and expatriating from their foreign jurisdiction back to the jurisdiction of your birthright.
.
We have made this Declaration of Domicile part of the Certificate of Assumed Name process, but you must all become aware of the importance of this issue of declaring your domicile as “land and soil” of Georgia, Maine, Texas, etc. — and enabled to bring it forward properly in court.
.
What advantage does a proper declaration of domicile provide you?
.
It means you have to be tried under the Public Law, not private international commercial law.  It means that there is no such thing as a “thought crime” or a “victimless crime” or a “statutory infringement”.  It means that you retain the full roster of trial options set forth in Blackstone’s Commentaries, including “Trial by Record”— which, if you have done your homework, will more than adequately prove that you are an American and that you are properly domiciled on the land and soil of your birth state.
.
That cuts you free of their municipal law, and it also demands that instead of being treated under their territorial law, you are owed The Law of Peace from their military courts, as a Third Party Civilian Non-Combatant having nothing to do with their internecine power struggles and con games.
.
If you have not actually and factually harmed someone who is bringing a complaint or stolen or damaged someone else’s property by your direct actions for which a complaining party appears — there is no case, no prevailing law, and no presumable jurisdiction for THEM to operate it.
.
You, therefore, have the option of declaring yourself free of their enslavement and their false claims, and merely have to become aware enough of the issues to do so and defend yourself and your assets accordingly.
.
Here, courtesy of a friend to the cause, is the controlling British law summation from Foreign and Domestic Law — a Concise Treatise on Private International Jurisprudence, by John Alderson Foote:
.
“The ‘right of expatriation’ is not, perhaps, the happiest of phrases, but it is manifest that the feudal theory of indissoluble allegiance had become an anachronism, and a Royal Commission was appointed in May 1868 to inquire into the English laws of naturalisation and allegiance generally.”
.
“As to domicil for testamentary purposes, or with relation to succession to personal property on intestacy, the law has been considerably modified …”
.
“British subjects dying in a foreign country shall be deemed for all purposes of testate or intestate succession as to movables to retain the domicil they possessed at the time of going to reside in such foreign country, unless they have resided in such foreign country for a year at least, and shall have made a formal and public written declaration of an intention to become domiciled there.”
.
“Domicil being a question of fact, it is not competent for individual States to enact restrictions upon, or facilities for, its acquisition ; and such enactments should not, in the tribunals of other States, obtain recognition.”
.
“The principle that laws are commands addressed to persons, which has been referred to above,(«) renders it important to consider what entities come within that term.”
.
“With regard to any particular municipal law, a foreign State must be regarded as occupying a position closely analogous to that of a foreign corporation; the personality of the latter being conferred upon it by its own municipal law, while that of the former is created by the public law of nations.”
.
“Foreign States, or bodies politic created by international law, occupy a position analogous to that of foreign corporations. In the case of monarchical governments, the Sovereign may be regarded as a corporation sole, representing the State; in the case of democratic or republican governments, the State itself, under its international name or style, as a body politic, may be regarded as a corporation aggregate.”
.
“Neither a personal Sovereign nor a body politic (or State) may be sued in an English Court, unless the privilege of sovereignty has been waived, expressly or impliedly, by voluntary submission to the jurisdiction or otherwise.”
.
Bring their BIRTH CERTIFICATE to court and lay it down on a copy of The Holy Bible and on top of that, lay down your Expatriation of your identical NAME from their domicile and back to the land and soil of your birth state. Add the Certificate of Assumed Name on top of that—- and stare the Judge in the eye.
.
You, as an American, are owed the full faith and credit provided by every municipal and territorial corporation on Earth.  You, as a British Territorial or Municipal “Citizen” are a slave and are owed nothing at all, not even common decency.
.
You make the choice.
.

_________________________________________________________

Posted in Uncategorized

Seizing Elian? Trump’s fault you say?!

In MARCH OF 1993 you say???


I will just leave this right here…

“In March of 1993, The United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in Reno v Flores. (Yes, “that” Reno. Janet Reno, Bill Clinton’s first Attorney General who ordered that young Elian Gonzalez be torn from his family’s arms while hiding in a Miami closet. You might remember the iconic photograph?)

The Court in Flores decided that minors could not be incarcerated with the adults accompanying them across the United States border illegally. The decision was the result of a long dispute in how to best care for these children while the adults were detained for criminal proceedings.

You see, when aliens cross the border illegally, they are incarcerated until their criminal case is decided. The understandable argument at the time was “why should children be incarcerated while their parents are in jail?” It seemed a fundamental violation of international human rights. Makes sense, right?

As a result, the Flores case drew a line in the sand. Children could not be incarcerated with their parents or accompanying adult while being held for illegal immigration violations. And a subsequent 1997 agreement stipulated that children must be placed in a safer environment where they could enjoy certain privileges, including education, a clean, safe environment and other normal life cycle amenities that incarcerated individuals do not enjoy.

It was considered a “victory” for human rights. By separating adult and child, we protected the children, reducing any harm done to them for their parent’s or accompanying adult’s decisions.

A lot has happened since then. However, bottom line, these juvenile shelters have been operating in accordance with the law and overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services to protect those children from the hazards of parental incarceration since 1997.

So, since Donald Trump was running his real estate empire and selling wine and casinos in 1993, we are left to determine just how Trump managed to orchestrate this cruel “separation of immigrant parent and child” 25 years BEFORE he was President of the United States! The obvious answer is – he didn’tHe had nothing to do with establishing this United States immigration policy. Today, he simply enforces it.

This one story illustrates how important it is for us to do our research regarding today’s headlines. The corporate media either refuses to do the research, is incapable of doing the research, or has done the research and decided to lie to you about its findings. Either way, this would make the corporate media lazy, incompetent or just plain deceptive.  Liars, if you will. But, if you are MSM, IT MAKES FOR A BETTER ‘STORY’ THAN THE IG REPORT and them ALL GOING TO GET ARRESTED!  

_________________________________________________________

Posted in Uncategorized

NEW: wireless electric vehicle technology will threaten driver and passenger health

wireless-roadways
(Naturalhealth365) With most electric vehicles requiring charging every 100 to 250 miles, engineers are scrambling to find a more ‘convenient’ wireless charging options. Researchers at the University of Colorado Boulder have developed a method of “on the go” wireless charging – in which charging plates would be installed in roadways, while a start-up technology company outside Philadelphia is focusing on stationary wireless charging.
Radiation from wireless systems and cell phones has already been associated with many health problems like, multiple sclerosis, cancer, infertility and cognitive problems. Natural health experts are very concerned that the high frequencies involved in wireless car charging will only add to the problem – posing a real and present danger to human health and the environment.

Wireless WARNING: “Electric highways” will greatly increase the risk of disease

In March, engineers in the Department of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering at University of Colorado Boulder announced they have developed a concept for wireless power transfer that uses very high frequencies to send energy to vehicles in motion.
The system requires the use of charging plates embedded in the road. Because cars are moving over them at a high rate of speed, engineers say that the plates – possibly located in special “charging Lanes” – would need to be installed every few meters.
The fact that there would be a 12-centimeter air gap between the roadway and the vehicle means the energy has only a small capacitance through which to be transferred. In the words of one of the researchers, this necessitated an “increase (in) the frequency of the electric fields.”
The team reported that they are using about 1,000 watts, in megahertz-scale frequencies, to send energy across the gap.

Alternate method converts magnetic waves to electricity

According to a story published in April in the Philadelphia Inquirer, Momentum Dynamics Corp. in Malvern, PA., has also developed a wireless recharging system for electric vehicles.
The system, which is already used to charge electric municipal buses in several U.S. cities, uses panels embedded in the pavement – transferring energy from the panels through the air and into the vehicles.
AC electrical current is converted to magnetic waves in the panel. A receiver mounted on the vehicle’s undercarriage ultimately converts the magnetic energy into DC electrical current that is stored in the vehicle’s battery.
The transmitter and receiver operate at 85 kHz, and are capable of charging electric vehicles roughly eight times faster than standard plug-in chargers.
Widespread adoption, of course, would necessitate a network of wireless car chargers embedded in roads and parking lots. But, are any of these developers concerned about the impact of these frequency vibrations on the human body?
Momentum Dynamics has already installed the chargers in several American cities, including Wenatchee, WA. According to a spokesperson, the Wenatchee technology uses a 200-kilowatt (200,000 watt) system.
By way of comparison, charging a smartphone requires 5 watts of power, while a laptop requires in the area of 100 watts. CEO Andy Daga calls the concept “revolutionary,” and claims that the technology can safely transmit electrical energy through air, water and ice.

“No heat or tingle” doesn’t mean it’s safe

A video intended to highlight the technology’s safety shows a person holding a working IPhone positioned between magnetic panels. The graphics on the phone’s screen are undisturbed, and the video is meant to illustrate that the phone can still make and receive calls, with “no heat or magnetic intrusion to a person’s hand or arm.”
“We’re showing it’s safe,” said Daga. “It (the technology) doesn’t give you any tingle. It doesn’t give you any heat. It doesn’t cause any damage to yourself or your phone.”
But researchers and natural health experts maintain that damage from high-frequency radiation occurs at the cellular level. In other words, the lack of sensations of heat and/or tingling does nothing to prove the system’s harmlessness.

High-frequency wireless technology is linked with rising rates of cancer

Cell phones and other wireless devices emit a form of electromagnetic field, or EMF, called radiofrequency radiation.
Researchers say ultra-high frequencies from EMFs have been associated with a variety of physical and emotional conditions, including multiple sclerosis, ADD, obesity, migraines, impaired fertility, chronic fatigue syndrome and higher rates of cancers of the brain, prostate, breast, liver, lungs and skin.
Effects from radioactive fields can be objectively measured – and include changes to neurotransmitters, breaks in DNA, increased production of free radicals and increased blood glucose.
(In fact, some doctors believe that electrosensitive individuals with high blood sugar may very well be suffering from “type 3” diabetes caused by RF radiation).
Double-blind studies have shown impacts on heart and blood pressure rates after a mere 35 minutes of cell phone activity.
And, a $25 million study by the National Toxicology Program (originally designed to prove that cell phone radiation is safe!) showed that 2G cell phone radiation causes brain cancer and DNA damage in rats.

Will wireless charging options increase the suffering of electrosensitive individuals?

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity, or electrosensitivity, is a recognized disorder, with the World Health Organization acknowledging that 3.5 percent to 5 percent of the population suffers from the syndrome when in proximity to wireless or electrical technologies such as smart meters, cell phones, laptop computers or power lines.
Symptoms – which include headache, nausea, dizziness, fatigue, difficulty concentrating, depression and sleep disorders – can take three to five years to develop.
With the increased radiation emanating from charging panels and pads, the suffering of vulnerable individuals may well increase exponentially.
And here’s a truly blood-chilling fact: environmental toxicity expert Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, PhD, reports that disease-causing pathogens become more aggressive in the presence of EMFs.
“Exposure to electromagnetic fields and microwaves from cell phone radiation is driving the virulence of many of the microbes that are naturally in us,” Dr. Klinghardt warns.
Although battery-operated electric vehicles accounted for only 1 percent of the market in the United States last year, this is likely to change as more options are developed for charging them. But will wireless charging of electric vehicles also result in an increase in the (already dangerously high) amounts of radiation to which we are exposed?
Sources for this article include:
MomentumDynamics.com
Philly.com
NaturalHealth365.com
ScienceDaily.com

_________________________________________________________

Posted in Uncategorized

Jural Assembly

Posted By: AZLew <Send E-Mail>

Only one of the better responses to ‘how did we get ourselves into this mess?’
Which mess? The one we are all living through.
Finally coming to terms with the consequences of allowing ‘money’ to be created as a substitute for exchanging one’s labor for something of real value.
Wow! What a heavy thought to show up here on CGI or RMN.
Mebbe so, but I’ll betcha Rayelan is probably thinking ‘omigosh, never thought it could happen, but yaaaay’
Jural Assembly. When people rely on eyeball contact and a handshake to exchange something of value.
In a nutshell, commerce without ‘money’ but mutual trust. Sometimes, if appropriate, an agreement reached in the presence of witnesses who may become the arbiters in the case of disagreement. Like a jury. But not the juries we have been aware of all our lives. Not the ones trained to pick over ‘legal’ details and so-called independent rationale but based on similar cases written down and interpreted by those ‘trained’ in the law. Somehow the training really overlooked justice, but that’s another subject for a later day.
Jural Assemblies are coming back. Slowly. For some it’s a hard concept to grasp, as our educational system has moved ever closer to training rather than education through discourse and thinking.
Jural Assemblies are in place – at least enough to begin to be noticed – in most of the States in this country. It’s true they really are not particularly obvious. Because it is a real grass roots movement. Not packaged for consumption for ‘someone else’ to benefit (i.e., give me your money) from it. You know, thievery under cover of ‘law.’
Jural Assembly. Google it. Surprise yourself. If it resonates, seek your own. Can’t find one? Start it yourself.
‘Nuf sed for now. Let’s see if RMN or CGI readers have some comment!

_________________________________________________________

Posted in Uncategorized