American Patriots Email Report

by Justice Anna von Reitz

.

Chinese Elders. Yeah, Right.

The only Chinese person in this story was posing as a Filipino.

Ferdinand Marcos, who as President of the “independent Government of the Philippines” set up in 1934 to act as Trustee for our gold reserves stored in the Philippine Islands— was Chinese.

And his family was involved in international banking in the Orient for generations, all the way back to the Plum Blossom Bank.

So we have a real Blue Blood Chinese banking family overlord —Marcos— in charge of the Government of the Philippines (Inc.) which was set up specifically to act as Trustee of American gold that was illegally and immorally transported to the Philippines beginning in the 1890’s by a Scottish Commercial Corporation infringing on our Trademarks and Copyrights and conducting business “in our names” without our knowledge or permission.

That they got away with it this long is emblematic of the secrecy they maintained about all this for the better part of a century.

What happens in Hong Kong stays in Hong Kong, and the same for Manila, because when people face facts the fantasies disappear.

To be sure, not all the gold in the Philippines is American, but a substantial portion of it is and there is no getting around that.

The Chinese-Philippine Government connect is not what it appears to be, then or now. The gold in question isn’t Chinese and never was Filipino, either.

So this whole idea that “the Chinese Elders” should be allowed to glom into our assets at the Behest of the World Bank, and determine whether we get our gold back or not, is ludicrous.

Now, I know a lot of people don’t like my sober opinion of the RV, either, but use your common sense—- if someone admits that they are able to do an RV, they are also admitting to being criminals who achieved a total take over and manipulation of the currency markets worldwide.

THAT is the reason that an RV can’t proceed in the way that the gurus describe it.

They’ve “gotten away with their crimes” many times, but admitting it in public is a different thing.

The basis of the RV would purportedly be vast new mineral deposit discoveries in Zimbabwe, which would wildly increase the value of that country’s Assets and Currency.

However, the discovery of massive mineral deposits in Zimbabwe is decades old, and what is really more to the point is their success or failure at getting a puppet installed as head of the government there.

As we speak the “Chinese” (banker) “Elders”
are leaving the US and going to Zimbabwe to discuss the situation and cut “the US” out of the “RV”, but that may not be so easy or advisable to do.

We don’t care if “the US” is cut out of the settlement process, but we won’t take it kindly if we, the actual Americans, are defrauded by “Chinese Elders”.

You see, it looks suspiciously like theft and World Bank chicanery to me, and simply in terms of what would happen to the individual perpetrators of such a scheme, it seems extremely ill-advised to me.

They may not care about anything but their delusional devotion to “money”— but as they wake up and realize that they will be signing their own death sentences if they attempt to pull this off, and that they will stand accused of worldwide, long-term commodity price-rigging and monopoly interest market control to boot, sobriety may set in.

The “Chinese Elders” pretending to be Filipinos and Indonesians are under demand to return the “trust” assets held “for” us in the Philippines and in the World Bank and in the Global Debt Facility.

Imagine that? That the actual owners and depositors should get back their own assets?

We have all the records and receipts of what was done in our names. The rest of the world now knows what the deal is and how the crooks have misrepresented it.

Yes, Virginia, things really are this screwed up and no, it can’t be fixed without a major overhaul—- whether you call the bankers involved “Chinese Elders” or not.

Just remember that just as Marcos was never Filipino, “the US” has never been “America” either.

That is American gold in the Philippines and at the World Bank, and we are the American Government. We are the ones with the history, provenance, and deposit receipts.
Not “the US”.

So even though the rogue elements of the US Military offered to sell our Farm to the Chinese it doesn’t matter, because our Farm was never theirs to sell, and our gold is our gold, too.

Any problem the “Chinese Elders” have needs to be addressed to the Pope, the Queen, and the Lord Mayor—- and all our purloined assets need to be returned to us.

by Justice Anna von Reitz

.

The Act of 1871 Was Repealed.

The Act of 1871 was indeed passed in 1871. Repealed in 1874. Then by piecemeal finally revived and passed in 1877, implemented in 1878. And it had precious little to do with us, as it was actually a restructuring of one of the foreign Federal Subcontractors to better avoid culpability for and to profit from crimes that the same Guilty Parties had already committed against us.

After the Civil War, the victorious Union Army that fought for the Northern Confederation reorganized what was left of the Federal Territorial Government to settle the bankruptcy Lincoln started in 1863, which he declared the day after he issued the first-ever Executive Order—- General Order 100.

by Justice Anna von Reitz

.

The Little Rain Cloud

My Mother described me in terms of being a “stubborn little rain cloud” of the kind that appears in the late afternoon and by bedtime has become a storm, complete with thunder and lightning.

Guilty as charged. I appear as a harbinger of things to come.

A great many patriots who have been depending, waiting, and believing that surely, Mr. Trump would deliver the long-awaited disclosures on July 4th—- have been sadly disappointed.

No whisper of any gallant military intervention in Business as Usual. No hint that the traitors in Congress have been dealt with. No, nothing of the sort. No announcements about new currency or rescued children or even an end to the senselessly destructive Covid-19 Farce.

Just more platitudes about what a great country this is and how inventive and plucky and talented our people are.

In fact, the only real message President Trump delivered was veiled as an attributed saying of Martin Luther King, Jr., almost an hour and forty minutes (1:38:44) into the Mount Rushmore speech, in which MLK (and Donald Trump) assert that our Founding Fathers signed a “Promissory Note” applying to future generations.

Well, Mr. President, let’s all have a look at that premise right now.

What happens to their debts when people die? They are supposed to be collected from their estate or written off; they are in no case supposed to accrue as debt owed by their progeny.

Yet, using this idea of a non-existent “Promissory Note” —generations of Americans have been saddled with debts that they do not in fact owe.

All debts of all Americans were paid off during the Andrew Jackson Administration and no further indebtedness was entered into (much to the chagrin of the European Central Banks) by Americans ever since.

We are in fact the Priority Creditors of these institutions, including the Federal Reserve.

So why is President Trump standing there in the shoes of FDR, referring to Promissory Notes written by the Founders? All their promissory notes have been paid off since before the Civil War.

The entire debt accrued since then has not been at the behest of the American States and People. Instead, all those Promissory Notes have been signed by British Territorial U.S. Citizens, most of whom don’t exist, and by Municipal PERSONS that don’t exist, either.

Think of a fraud scheme in which 640 million fake “legal persons” are created out of thin air, via the use of unconscionable contracting processes, and the assets of the people these “legal persons” are named after, are attached as collateral backing the debts of these poppets? These voodoo doll-like “legal constructs”?

That’s what has been going on here in this country ever since the Civil War. And we have been conscripted and enslaved and our property assets have been stolen to pay the debts of these fabricated “citizens”.

Mr. Trump, do you really want to talk about Promissory Notes and debts owed by the Founding Fathers? I think you should instead pay attention to the Promissory Notes being floated by members of the U.S. Congress and the “Congress of the [Municipal] United States”.

All our debts are long paid and we have stood on the Creditor side of the ledger since the days of Andrew Jackson. The debts are not ours and we did not knowingly or willingly conscript ourselves and neither did our Mothers “donate” us as Wards of any Territorial State of State.

These horrible and egregious wrongs against the American States and People will not go away or be misinterpreted as anything but the criminal and predatory Breach of Trust and Commercial Contract that they are.

Your corporations, Mr. Trump, and their Principals, are at fault.

You guys have been the ones writing all the Promissory Notes against our assets behind our backs and you are the ones that owe us a complete accounting and a forthright and honest settlement of all these accounts that you have created “in our names” without any authority or conscionable contract to do so.

We stand upon the land and soil of this great country and no amount of European charlatanism will change the facts. This horrific commercial fraud and crime against your Employers has got to end.

In recent days, it has been rumored that you, Mr. Trump, have out-blackmailed the professional blackmailers at the Vatican. We have been informed of this dubious triumph, but the end effect is that we have a better blackmailer working for us, as opposed to having an honest government and the moral high ground that the American States and People are owed.

If we leave it at the cheaters being out-cheated, what good is that?

The times will change and more cheating will abound, new and different excuses for enslaving future generations will be found. How does what you proposed — the existence of “promissory notes” written by earlier generations— correct the actual problem, which is systemic institutionalized commercial and international fraud and Breach of Trust against the American people?

It doesn’t.

And that’s why, Mr. Trump, despite all the nice words for this Fourth of July, your actions fall far short of any satisfactory answer or due correction.

by Justice Anna von Reitz

.

What Kind of “Assembly”?

Some patriots point to the fact that there were Christian assemblies functioning as elements of the government that existed prior to the Revolution and try to make a case for thinking that Christian assemblies are what are referenced with respect to our lawful government. This is not true.

Our Founders made a very decided choice when constructing our government and they very purposefully did not create a theocracy of any kind.

They wanted to avoid the kind of religious oppression that they and their ancestors experienced in Europe and they knew that in order to secure freedom of religion for themselves, they would have to guarantee freedom of religion for everyone else.

The Separation of Church and State was adopted, and religion was (hopefully forever) admitted to being a private matter.

This wise decision on their part and the creation of secular State Assemblies to run the government of this country, is what keeps radical Muslim and Jewish groups at bay and prevents the kind of religious strife that consumes other countries to this day.

So our State Assemblies are not Christian assemblies and not meant to be. Our State Assemblies are secular in nature, and everyone of every creed, color, and ethnicity is welcome to participate.

Another important point about our State Assemblies, is that they are not State-of-State “Assemblies”.

Along with the other semantic deceits that have crept into popular use is the misuse of the word “Assembly” to describe State-of-State organizations composed of U.S. Citizens or even “citizens of the United States”.

These organizations are properly called “societies” or “associations” —- but the pernicious mis-labeling of these groups has led to no end of confusion and continued attempts by U.S. Citizens and Municipal citizens of the United States to form “assemblies”.

State Assemblies are formed by the American People claiming their singular allegiance to their State of the Union.

Any group of American Persons owing allegiance to the British Monarch or the Pope, is not an assembly by definition, and everyone concerned needs to be fully aware of that fact.

This is why actual State Assemblies are at such pains to be sure that all members complete their paperwork and declarations and record the same, so that the honor and nature of the State Assembly is unsullied and their authority is unquestionable with regard to the land and soil of this country.

Anyone who wishes to retain any vestige of allegiance to the British Monarch or the Pope is foreclosed from joining the State Assembly and operating as a State Citizen. Our Forefathers separated the jurisdictions to prevent conflicts of interest and we maintain that separation for the same reasons.

Finally, let it be noted throughout that while our Public Government is Secular and Non-Sectarian, our British and Papal Subcontractors have adopted structures opposed to our government.

The British Territorial Government is a democracy.

The Papist Municipal Government is a theocracy.

And our actual government is neither.

So, when you join an actual State Assembly as a State Citizen, be prepared to chuck all other affiliations and allegiances at the door. Realize that you are not part of any democracy or a theocracy of any kind anymore; you are instead one of the living progeny, one of the People of this country, living in a republican State of the Union.

Actual State Assembly = republican State of the Union = American People = Jural Assemblies

Subcontracting British Territorial Government = Democracy = U.S. Citizens = Jural Societies and Associations

Subcontracting Municipal Government = Theocracy = “citizens of the United States” = Jural Commissions and Councils

When our actual State Assemblies encounter would-be members who don’t (1) knowingly and willingly produce their proper Declarations or (2) fail to publically record the same or (3) persist in speaking and acting in terms of Federal or Municipal code (which is all foreign law to us), or (4) follow a pattern of trying to use the Assembly for their personal grievances or (5) cause disruption to the good order and function and credibility and honor of the Assembly —– our Assemblies are encouraged to educate such people if possible, and to, if necessary, ban them from participation.

Having the right to participate in a State Assembly is based upon acceptance of the grave public responsibility involved. This requires a thorough understanding of exactly which level of government the actual State Assembly occupies and the capacity in which the State Assembly acts.

Those who mistake the actual State Assembly for a State-of-State “Assembly” (should be called a “Society” or “Association”) and those who would attempt to commandeer our State Assembly to function as a State-of-State level entity, must be barred from participation.

.

This is a doctor whose specialty is disaster preparedness and response plans to Fortune 500 companies, schools, etc. and you will learn a lot about Covid-19 in the 17-minute video.   Watch at least the first and last 3 minutes!

It will erase the FEAR element the news has placed on everyone.

.

NEW BOOK

Don’t Bungee Jump Naked
And Other Important Stuff

Visit Jeanne’s Humor Store!

Even after a broken femur, Jeanne rocks on!!

Click here to see Jeanne’s Live Shows.

Do not set foot in their Court  by Robert-dean:House

.

I have to type it all out here but it can be accessed by going to, “charlotteclerk.com” then go to the records circle and put, “House, Robert” into the boxes then scroll down to the summons then find the Affidavit of no contract response.

.

Filing # 107003928 E-File 05/04/2020 11:27:50AM

.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR

                                               CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA

                                                               CIVIL ACTION

AMOS BENTON HESTER, III.

Plaintiff,

                                                                                          Case No.   20000370CA

vs.

.

ROBERT D. HOUSE, FLORIDA TAX CERTIFICATE

FUND, LLC, AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE

COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF THOMAS REIDY.

Defendant

.

__________________________________________/

.

                                                                  SUMMONS

To: Robert D. House

46400 Bermont Road

Punta Gorda, Florida 33982

.

                                                                   IMPORTANT

.

       A lawsuit has been filed against you.  You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a written response to the attached complaint with the clerk of this court. A phone call will not protect you.  your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want the court to hear your side of the case.  If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the court.  There are other legal requirements.  You may want to call an attorney right away.      If you do not know an attorney, you may call an attorney referral service or legal aid office (listed in the phone

book).

.

       If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the court you must mail or take a copy of your written response to the Plaintiff’s Attorney named below.

.

                                                                      Paul A. Ryan, Esq.

                                                                      Payne Ryan, PLLC

                                                                      25073 Marion Avenue

                                                                      Punta Gorda, Fl. 33951

                                                                       (941) 655-8970

                                                                       Florida Bar no 567329

.

This first-page document is the invite of a third party interloper wishing to contract with me on behalf of another within their Legal System and out of the Lawful System.  This is all fictitious with fictitious Characters.  It is created to get me to contract with the Attorney within the Fictitious Court System.  As a claimed real Live Life People, I am not obligated to such a contract, however, if left unanswered they will use Tacit Consent and then use LEO’s to enforce their fraud.  This is just the first page of 22 pages of all fraud written up by the Attorney.  No victim / witness statements.  It was placed into the public record and it does have the States Process servers date and time printed in ink on it but no signature of that server.

.

Do not wait to get into the court before giving an answer, you will lose.

.

Here is my answer….

.

                                  (AFFIDAVIT)STATEMENT:OF-NO-CONTRACT

.

Name: Robert-dean:House

.

Godly Origin: Fertilization: on or about 17 Dec. 1956

.

Address: c/o 46400 Bermont Road, Punta Gorda, Florid {33982}

.

Home phone 941-833-1055             Cell / Work phone: 239 -229-6243

.

AFFIANT- Being first duly sworn deposes and says that from his personal knowledge:

.

Under Common Law, I do not recognize or Consent to this Contract, Summons Case No. 20000370CA.

.

I do not consent to a court enforcing this contract.

.

I do not consent to the jurisdiction of the court.

.

Under penalty of perjury, I swear that this statement is true and correct to the best of my ability.

                                  By:  (My Autograph as), Robert-dean:House AFFIANT

.

Sworn and subscribed before me

this 26 day of May, 2020

Notary: Sean Degraw

.

Witness:  Jeffery Bossert

Witness:  Robert Polimeni

‘

I then put it into the public record and received a certified copy and made copies and sent them via certified mail to the client his Attorney and I also served a copy to the Clerk of court.  You must not make the mistake of thinking they have a copy from the public record.  You need the return receipt showing that they got it.  I also do a mailing with two witnesses present and have them autograph and thumbprint two pages of a Proof Of Mailing.  I then insert one of the copies into the mailing.

.

To this day they have no legal or lawful recourse.  The Attorney sent me two letters which I have secured as evidence and have since mailed of charges to the Sheriff, Sec. of State, Fl. Attorney Gen. Fl. and Sec. of State, D.C.  I have all returned receipts accept the Att. Gen.

.

Any comments?  Please call or email

.

trefarmerh@centurylink.net

.