First, don’t admit to being the defendant. When the ‘judge’ calls your NAME, I’d say “I’m here for that matter”.
Judge then asks What’s your NAME?
Answer: “I’m Jaro of the family Smith. Are there any charges against me?”

Now the “judge” has a problem. If he says YES, he acknowledged that you’re not the statutory person JARO SMITH (with first and last name), but instead a real Man/Woman Jaro Smith (with given and family name).

And if he says NO, then you can just say “GOOD BYE” since what you’re doing there when there are no charges against you. You kept your promise to come to court and aren’t obliged to do anything more.

Remember, ‘Jaro Smith’ can be EITHER, the name of a MAN or the name of a corporate SUBJECT. Court PRESUMES that it is a corporate NAME, but you don’t have to go along with that presumption. If they’re so eager to charge the corporate PERSON, let them PROVE that on the RECORD.

And of course, if there are charges against Jaro Smith, the Man, then they can’t proceed under statutory jurisdiction, but must proceed under the common law of the Republic. Then you can file into the case any pre-1933 case quote (such as freedom of travel brief, Hale v Henkel, etc.), and they’ll have to obey it, and not ignore it like they do under statutory jurisdiction.

Now I haven’t used it yet, but knowing who I am and who they are, helped me to block IRS’s attempts to classify my earnings as taxable income, for the last 5 years.

Like Sun Tzu said, “If you know the enemy and KNOW YOURSELF, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.”

_________________________________________________________